![]() 03/17/2016 at 14:26 • Filed to: Tags (max. 30) | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() 03/17/2016 at 14:30 |
|
That’s a nice looking tubey-thingie you got there..
![]() 03/17/2016 at 14:30 |
|
cool
![]() 03/17/2016 at 14:30 |
|
Spit valve yo
EDIT: oh... it’s there, just not ‘sploded
![]() 03/17/2016 at 14:31 |
|
I didn’t know what to call it.
![]() 03/17/2016 at 14:33 |
|
Ah, the all new Ikea Körnett
![]() 03/17/2016 at 14:33 |
|
![]() 03/17/2016 at 14:35 |
|
I had a friend who started her own instrument repair company - they used to go around to all the schools and get business from kids who hated their instruments, and their parents who had to pay to fix them.. it was quite lucrative I guess.
![]() 03/17/2016 at 14:38 |
|
Your valves need some holes
![]() 03/17/2016 at 14:41 |
|
I’m aware, but I had a fast-approaching deadline and Solidworks was being petulant with swept cuts.
![]() 03/17/2016 at 14:41 |
|
NSFW? I didn’t know you could post pictures of a model showing off
all
her parts.
![]() 03/17/2016 at 14:47 |
|
Looks good, now do one in photoview 360 and frame it for generations to see and admire.
![]() 03/17/2016 at 14:55 |
|
![]() 03/17/2016 at 15:03 |
|
Solidworks is a fickle mistress.
![]() 03/17/2016 at 15:24 |
|
you forgot the balloons!
![]() 03/17/2016 at 15:29 |
|
I want to post an exploded view of a grand piano buts just not practical. So have the key action:
![]() 03/17/2016 at 15:37 |
|
I need to get into the action (ha) on the one my mom and dad have in their living room. Some dozen keys are just pbbbllt, sticking.
![]() 03/17/2016 at 15:40 |
|
I wouldn’t screw around with the action unless you really know what you are doing or this is just a cheapy grand that isn’t played much.
![]() 03/17/2016 at 15:44 |
|
Swept Cut? Drop a plane perpendicular to what you want your thru hole axis to be and tangent to the valve body then an Extruded Cut will take care of it.
![]() 03/17/2016 at 15:48 |
|
It’s a perhaps ninety year old upright that isn’t played much. Probably not much would be coming apart, and certainly nothing being readjusted, just a little peench of graphite in a few select places.
![]() 03/17/2016 at 15:48 |
|
This fact gets reaffirmed on almost an hourly basis in my world. What I always enjoy is the ridiculous rebuild times for (in my mind) simple features. For instance: 2 sketched bends on a sheet metal part. 15 fucking minute rebuild time. Turns out that one was based on the “auto updating cutlist” option... on a 1 part cut list. Un-checking turns it from 15 min to 0.1 second rebuild.
![]() 03/17/2016 at 17:28 |
|
I miss working in Solidworks/Unigraphics..
AutoDesk Inventor is close, but Revit insn’t the same..
![]() 03/17/2016 at 17:29 |
|
Don’t use swept cuts, just generate a work plane in the center line of the cylinder, and remove material from there.
![]() 03/17/2016 at 17:43 |
|
Good old solidworks. From my experience I still like it more than Inventor or NX I-DEAS. The simulations were also pretty cool when testing parts for FSAE. Now I deal with AutoCad and Revit.